-
The symptom and its function -
Why,
at one point, does the dream not suffice to sustain what is insisting
within repression? The dream as a chain of representations fails to support
the return of the repressed, hence anxiety and symptom. In anxiety, the
subject is faced with a jouissance unable to be represented. As for the
symptom, it is the writing in the social link of the jouissance resisting
repression.
-
The writing of the symptom -
With
the symptom, interpretation meets its limits because interpretation falls
within the logic of the signifier. The symptom carries with it a dimension,
irreducible using the logic of the signifier, that assumes the form of
the writing of something else. In the treatment, how is interpretation
stymied by the letter? And what about the bodily dimension thus put at
stake by the symptom?
-
The symptom as a metaphor -
The
symptom introduces a formalism of writing. How, from the formal envelope
of the symptom, can we deduce the fantasy of which the symptom is the
bodily metaphor? Providing formal consistency to what the signifier fails
to represent, the letter of the symptom carves out the furrows of the
fantasy.
-
The manœuvre -
In
the treatment of the real at stake in the symptom, the analyst’s manœuvre
is what operates the Freudian "pass" from the symptom to the
fantasy. As Freud teaches, analysis organizes the treatment of the symptom
by freeing up the rigorous modeling of which the symptom is the writing.
What then appears is a formulation that calculates the subject’s singular
relation to the irreducible that the writing of the symptom misses.
|
Recherche | Formation
| Publications | Colloques
| Club.Art |