Activities for 2004-2005

The IFPE And The Loewald Award

On November 5, 2004, at the sixteenth annual Conference of the International Federation for Psychoanalytic Education (IFPE), the Federation bestowed its prestigious Hans Loewald Memorial Award upon GIFRIC, in recognition of that organization's unique contribution to psychoanalytic practice and theory, especially that of the psychoanalytic treatment of psychosis. Usually the prize is given to an individual, but this year IFPE's selection committee chose to recognize GIFRIC as an organization. Also this was the first time the award was given to someone outside the United States. After receiving the award Willy Apollon, Danielle Bergeron and Lucie Cantin each presented an aspect of an address entitled: "Psychoanalysis Today Faces Science and Psychosis."

 

IFPE is an organization that offers a home for individuals, institutes and organizations who are committed to fostering the growth of psychoanalysis as an integral part of the culture, and who seek a non-sectarian forum to share their perspective with others. Its membership is open to anyone with a self-identified interest in psychoanalysis, whether clinical, academic, artistic, or philosophical. IFPE seeks to encourage alternatives to restrictive psychoanalytic training, to reverse the decline of psychoanalysis as a viable profession, and to facilitate dialogue with disciplines that can enrich psychoanalysis by broadening its horizons.

Hans W. Loewald (1906-1992), the man in whose name this award is given, was a practitioner, scholar, and teacher with a deep respect for the history and complexity of psychoanalytic thought. He was an innovator, willing to challenge prevailing wisdom in order to extend the boundaries of psychoanalytic knowledge.

The Chicago Circle Clinical Day

On the day preceding the conference, the Chicago Circle hosted a clinical day and an evening workshop. It included three case presentations by members of the Chicago Circle, Paul Shahbaz, Traci Nix and Charles Turk, entitled respectively : "Nobody knows my name" an example of schizophrenic fragmentation; "Spider Lady" a case illustrating problems that enactment can produce; and "The man in the box" a case of manic-depressive rigidity.

A format was employed, that has since become known as the "Chicago Style," where extensive case material was provided to Willy Apollon, Danielle Bergeron and Lucie Cantin ahead of time to assist them in planning the discussion.

That same evening a workshop was held to which were invited individuals interested in how a treatment program for psychotics modeled upon 388 might be developed. While the turnout was smaller than we had hoped, those in attendance participated enthusiastically in the discussion of how 388 came to be and about how the concepts that sustain it were developed, and some have continued to come to our meetings and participate in our discussions.

Our Personal Reactions

This year’s meeting of the IFPE was a very special one for us. We were moved by the recognition given to GIFRIC and its three directors, and by their messages. Their presentations, and the others given by them and by other members of the École stimulated us to return to our work with redoubled energy. It was a special pleasure to have the Loewald Award presented to them in Chicago, and at the same meeting where Charles Turk was awarded the Outstanding Educator Award. The addresses they gave – Willy Apollon’s comparison of science and speech in the treatment of psychosis, Danielle Bergeron’s exposition of psychoanalytic treatment through a case, and Lucie Cantin’s synthesis of the 388 program – reached the audience with clarity and were enthusiastically received. Several of our colleagues commented on GIFRIC’s work in the closing meeting on the last day of the conference. A former president and current board member, Patrick Kavanaugh, said to us afterward that this is exactly what IFPE should be about, and that the contribution they made in their Loewald address set a very high standard for our future. In an e-mail message to the board, he added: “The message from GIFRIC’s directors describes an impact on the international community that both reflects and advances, I believe, the mission statements and goals of the Federation as described in our membership directory. … And certainly, it keeps alive the spirit in which the Loewald Award was first established and is presented each year. In a time of very little good news, the world is truly a better place today for everyone’s efforts and energies.”

This has opened the way considerably for the advancement of our efforts to start a program like the 388 in Chicago. After the meeting, several new students joined our seminars, brought in by hearing either the Loewald Award presentations, or the clinical day and the evening presentation following it—and the other GIFRIC presentations in the meetings. We are looking forward to getting copies of the text of all the Loewald presentations to discuss in our groups.

January 1, 2005

Waud Kracke, Lucia Villela, Charles Turk

e-mail: cetbat@xnet.com